Environment

Switching from coal, oil to natural gas accelerates climate change – study

natural gas climate

Photo: Pixabay

Published

October 1, 2019

Country

Comments

comments icon

0

Share

Published:

October 1, 2019

Country:

Comments:

comments icon

0

Share

Conversion from coal and oil to natural gas increases the greenhouse effect of energy consumption by around 40%, according to a new study released by German think-and-do-tank Energy Watch Group (EWG).

The International Energy Agency (IEA) is “repeatedly playing down” the climate impact of natural gas, thus laying the foundation for national governments to continue to heavily subsidize fossil fuels. Against this background, the Energy Watch Group presented the latest scientific findings on the future suitability of natural gas in the new study.

Photo: EWG

The key finding of EWG’s study debunks the widespread picture of natural gas as a climate-friendly bridge technology: The switch from coal-fired power generation and oil-fired heating to gas increases the greenhouse effect of energy supply by around 40% due to alarming methane emissions. Thus, contrary to what is widely communicated to the public, natural gas does not contribute to climate protection, but instead causes an additional acceleration of climate change, the study finds.

The switch from coal-fired power generation and oil-fired heating to gas increases the greenhouse effect of energy supply by around 40% due to alarming methane emissions

The study calculates for the first time the climate impact of a fossil-fossil substitution by gas based on the latest research on methane and carbon dioxide emissions of the entire supply chain, arriving at the conclusion that possible CO2 savings from natural gas are far outweighed by its high methane emissions.

A switch from coal and crude oil in the electricity, heat, and transport sectors to natural gas even significantly exceeds the highly negative climate impact of coal and crude oil, EWG states.

“The IEA, which many governments regard as a reference for their energy policy decisions, deceives us with outdated figures and problematic assumptions about the actual climate impact of natural gas – with devastating consequences for our climate and the economy,” explained Dr. Thure Traber, co-author and leading scientist of the EWG. “The economic risks of natural gas are significant: If the climate targets are to be achieved on national and international levels, then it is simply impossible for investments in natural gas to pay for themselves. What will remain are stranded investments in the billions.”

Instead, we urgently need more investments in renewable energies, because only these have an immediate and lasting positive effect on the climate

“The study confirms that the production of highly climate-damaging natural gas will further exacerbate climate change,” added Hans-Josef Fell. The former member of the German Parliament and President of the Energy Watch Group, who was involved in the study as co-author, calls for a rethink in the current political debate about the future of the energy sector. “Existing and new subsidies for natural gas are incompatible with the Paris climate protection targets. Instead, we urgently need more investments in renewable energies, because only these have an immediate and lasting positive effect on the climate.”

What exactly politics has to do in order to establish a sustainable energy system is clear to the authors of the study: an immediate abolition of all subsidies for fossil fuels and a comprehensive introduction of emission-free, renewable technologies; the existing natural gas infrastructure can alternatively be used for climate-friendly biogas and green gases such as hydrogen from green electricity, EWG said.

Since a worldwide transition of the energy system to 100% renewable energies would save 55% of global greenhouse gas emissions, this measure must be at the center of all climate protection efforts. The study points out that fossil energies have no place in the future energy system and calls upon politicians to correct the false image of natural gas as a climate-friendly bridge technology.

Comments (0)

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Enter Your Comment
Please wait... Please fill in the required fields. There seems to be an error, please refresh the page and try again. Your comment has been sent.

Related Articles

Council of Europe Romas disproportionately exposed environmental hazards North Macedonia

Council of Europe urges North Macedonia to improve environment, protect Romas from disproportionate risks

29 July 2025 - North Macedonia should bridge the gap between commitments and reality on human rights of Romas and environmental protection, the Council of Europe said

Turkish geothermal power plant operator drill for geothermal lithium

Turkish renewables firm to drill for geothermal lithium

26 July 2025 - Margün Energy intends to search for lithium in geothermal water in western Turkey, where it took over a 12 MW geothermal power plant

Three cities reviving protests against Rio Tinto lithium project Jadar in Serbia

Three cities reviving protests against Rio Tinto’s lithium project in Serbia

20 July 2025 - Opponents of Rio Tinto's plan to mine and process a lithium and boron ore called jadarite in western Serbia held a protest in Loznica

bih epbih waste incineration tpp tuzla trial

BiH’s power utility EPBiH cancels waste co-incineration trial in Tuzla coal plant

18 July 2025 - Power utility Elektroprivreda Bosne i Hercegovine aborted a waste co-incineration test at its Tuzla coal power plant