Electricity

IEEFA: GE lost billions in market capitalization by misjudging energy transition

Photo: Pixabay

Published

June 7, 2019

Country

Comments

comments icon

0

Share

Published:

June 7, 2019

Country:

Comments:

comments icon

0

Share

According to a report by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), General Electric (GE) lost USD 193 billion or 74% of its market capitalization over 2016-2018.

“This value destruction was driven in large measure by the collapse of the new thermal power construction market globally – a collapse which caught GE entirely by surprise,” reads the report, General Electric Misread the Energy Transition: A Cautionary Tale.

“GE lost investors an almost unprecedented and simply staggering US$193 billion in just three years to 2018, 74% of its market capitalization,” said co-author Tim Buckley, Director of Energy Finance Studies at IEEFA, according to a press release from IEEFA.

As the largest shareholder, BlackRock investors suffered a USD 16 billion loss in the three years of 2016-2018 related to its GE holdings, representing in effect a huge stranded asset loss, according to the press release.

“Unless investors want to cop a repeat hiding similar to GE’s, BlackRock needs to urgently divest from fossil fuels and invest in zero-emission industries of the future,” said Buckley.

It is in shareholder hands to ensure “companies evaluate and understand the inevitable energy transition as the world accelerates towards meeting the Paris Agreement,” said report co-author and IEEFA financial analyst Kathy Hipple.

IEEFA said that GE assumed wrongly that demand for natural gas and coal would continue to track global economic growth. The company did not recognize the ever-lowering costs of renewable technologies and the increased take-up of energy efficiency, which decoupled energy demand from economic activity.

The misstep forced CEO Jeff Immelt into early retirement and cost his successor, John Flannery, his job after less than a year, the report reads, recalling that the average tenure of a GE CEO, prior to Flannery, had been over 12 years. And for the first time in its history, the company did not hire from within, selecting Larry Culp, former CEO of Danaher, a science and technology innovator whose products are concentrated in the fields of environmental and other solutions, “to right the ship,” according to the report.

“The world is transitioning away from fossil fuels – particularly expensive imported thermal coal and gas – into low-cost, zero-pollution domestic renewables such as wind and solar,” said report co-author Tom Sanzillo, IEEFA’s Director of Finance. “This is where the smart money is, but GE failed to pick the trend – and ultimately failed.”

Comments (0)

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Enter Your Comment
Please wait... Please fill in the required fields. There seems to be an error, please refresh the page and try again. Your comment has been sent.

Related Articles

Serbia EMS grid connection contracts seven battery storage projects

Serbia’s EMS signs grid connection contracts for seven battery storage projects

30 April 2026 - Serbia's TSO Elektromreža Srbije signed grid connection contracts for seven standalone battery storage projects

croatia star energy enna geo geothermal projects

British Star Energy sells three geothermal projects in Croatia

30 April 2026 - The transaction releases EUR 5.2 million of restricted cash and removes future capital commitments arising from licences, the company said

Energy transition as systemic transformation Siemens Energy Lazar Mijic interview

Energy transition as systemic transformation

30 April 2026 - We spoke with Lazar Mijić, Head of Global Business Strategy in the business area Transformation of Industries at Siemens Energy, about where the region currently stands on the map of global energy transition

Greek government sees PV losses from zero prices as informal support for consumers

Greece frames solar power’s zero prices as informal consumer support

30 April 2026 - The Greek government is reluctant to remunerate photovoltaic producers for their high losses from zero or negative hourly wholesale prices