Energy Efficiency

Small portion of public funds dedicated to upgrading buildings in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe 

Photo: BPIE


October 2, 2017






October 2, 2017





Only 3 percent of the public funds that could be used to support energy-efficiency investments in the Central, Eastern and South-East Europe are dedicated to upgrading buildings. This shows that buildings are not considered to be critical energy infrastructure, although they can help reduce energy dependency and have other positive impacts, the Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE) said.

“Though the region is burdened with energy poverty and energy security concerns, the current allocation of EU and international funds shows that buildings are not considered to be critical energy infrastructure, despite the potential of deep renovation to reduce energy dependency, increase savings on energy bills and improve health and air quality”, BPIE said in a statement.

In an analysis of both EU and non-EU funding streams available in the region, BPIE stated that only 4.35 percent of the region’s Cohesion Policy Funds is allocated to demand-side infrastructure, amounting to EUR 3.96 billion.

It also said that the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) has very little impact in the region, with only two energy projects active.

The analysis showed that the international financial institutions allocate only 1.7 percent of their total committed investments to demand-side infrastructure.

“Investing in demand-side energy infrastructure must be a strategic priority for this region. The majority of buildings in the region urgently need deep renovation to reduce health and security risks,” BPIE Executive Director Oliver Rapf said.

BPIE suggests the creation of a regional energy efficiency financing platform that integrates capacity-building, investment facilitation and project aggregation to create effective financing instruments and investment opportunities for demand-side energy efficiency.

“This would encourage private and institutional investment and result in a high investment leverage factor, as results from other countries show. More effective use of funds to attract additional private and public money is of utmost importance.” the institute said.

Similar situation in Western Balkans

The Western Balkans Investment Framework (WBIF), the Regional Energy Efficiency Program (REEP) and the Green for Growth Fund (GGF,) all support demand-side infrastructure. However, the amount of funding dedicated to energy efficiency is limited, except for the WBIF which allocates a small part to energy and even less to energy efficiency, BPIE said.

To date, only six of 144 projects financed by the WBIF are in the energy efficiency sector and have received EUR 49 million. Out of these six projects only three relate to energy efficiency in buildings, with a total investment of EUR 54.5 million and WBIF funding of EUR 22.6 million.

Photo 1: Western Balkans Investment Framework allocations, BPIE analysis

The REEP which integrates finance, technical assistance and policy dialogue, is the main funding instrument in the Western Balkans region supporting energy efficiency investments. it was founded in 2012, and its total budget was EUR 169.35 million, with  EUR 23.35 million being grants from the WBIF.

REEP plus which covers period 2017-2020, extends the program to the residential sector (at least 20,000 households). REEP plus has a total budget of EUR 197.5 million, of which EUR 30 million is from EU grants, the analysis states.

One of the main tools of the REEP is the Western Balkans Sustainable Energy Financing Facility II (WeBSEFF II), that is used to encourage private and municipal borrowers to pursue sustainable energy projects that are often challenging to develop, finance and implement. It has a budget of EUR 106.5 million, where EUR 3.3 million is used for technical cooperation, while 15 percent of the WeBSEFF II goes to increasing energy efficiency in buildings.

The GGF was initiated in 2009 by the EIB and KfW to enhance energy efficiency and foster renewable energies in South-East Europe, in the form of a public-private partnership with a layered risk/return structure. As of March 2015, the committed volume amounts to EUR 185.6 million, with a considerable share (62 percent) going to demand-side infrastructure.

BPIE added that although the regional investments programs have taken steps in the right direction, additional measures are needed to boost private investments in demand-side infrastructure, reminding that the energy intensity of the Western Balkan countries is much higher than the average of the EU which is partly due to an inefficient building stock.

Comments (0)

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Enter Your Comment
Please wait... Please fill in the required fields. There seems to be an error, please refresh the page and try again. Your comment has been sent.

Related Articles

Turkey one third world geothermal greenhouses

Turkey accounts for one third of world’s geothermal greenhouses

05 August 2022 - The surface of greenhouses heated with geothermal energy in Turkey grew 400% since 2002, says Mücahit Kıvrak from the Balıkesir University

Serbia target emissions cut 40 3 by 2030 upcoming NECP

Serbia to target emissions cut of 40.3% by 2030 in upcoming NECP

27 July 2022 - Serbia presented the preliminary goals for its integrated national energy and climate plan as it is about to start a public debate

GGF takes green finance graduates on study tour in Berlin

14 July 2022 - GGF's Technical Assistance Facility and the Renewables Academy (RENAC) hosted a study tour in Berlin for the graduates of the Green Finance Expert Course

Green for Growth Fund record expansion 2021

Green for Growth Fund achieves record expansion in 2021

12 July 2022 - GGF recorded its strongest ever net growth in its outstanding portfolio, with EUR 1.3 billion in green loans to over 42,000 end borrowers