Electricity

Serbia considering three options for Đerdap 3 pumped storage hydropower plant

djerdap 3 romania serbia capacity veljko kovacevic

Photo: EPS

Published

October 2, 2024

Country

Comments

comments icon

0

Share

Published:

October 2, 2024

Country:

Comments:

comments icon

0

Share

Serbia is considering three options for the capacity of the Đerdap 3 pumped storage hydropower plant, according to the Ministry of Mining and Energy.

The Ministry and Mining said the feasibility study is in the final stage.

“We expect to complete an additional part called market simulation within a month, to get insight into the financial impact of the pumped storage hydropower plant on the operations of hydropower plant Đerdap 1 for long-term financial forecasts”, the ministry’s State Secretary Veljko Kovačević told Euronews Serbia.

Of note, the ministry said in March that the hydrology study and the preliminary feasibility study have been completed for Đerdap 3.

A capacity of 2,400 MW has been floated, but Kovačević now reveals three options are under consideration.

From a national to a regional project

“With 1,400 MW, we would have a pumped storage hydropower plant for the needs on the national level, with 1,800 MW we would already have a regional project, and the last option being considered, of 2,400 MW, changes the energy landscape of the wider region”, Kovačević stressed.

Pumped storage hydropower plants gained importance over the last several years, as by storing energy they enable greater integration of renewables. Serbia is currently much closer to the construction of another facility – Bistrica.

The location for Đerdap 3 is on the Danube and on the border with Romania, which therefore must be included in project preparation. Yugoslavia – including Serbia – and its neighbor jointly built the Đerdap 1 and 2 (Iron Gate 1 and 2) complex. Romania earlier suggested it could agree to participate with a 50% share.

In early August, Romanian Minister of Energy Sebastian Burduja said the government in Bucharest would carefully track the plans related to the investment. Romania won’t allow production at the existing Iron Gate 1 and 2 to come under jeopardy, he said.

US company Bechtel was involved in the preparation of the study

The Serbian side, in his words, sent initial data on the proposed investment and its impact on the infrastructure of Iron Gate 1 and 2. Serbia conducted the said study with United States–based company Bechtel, Burduja added.

It should be noted that Romania and Bulgaria qualified in July their joint hydropower project Turnu Măgurele – Nikopol on the Danube for the European Union’s financial support.

Comments (0)

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Enter Your Comment
Please wait... Please fill in the required fields. There seems to be an error, please refresh the page and try again. Your comment has been sent.

Related Articles

europe energy crisis mickoski north macedonia

Europe is facing energy crisis in winter because of Ukraine

04 October 2024 - About half of Ukraine’s power generation capacity is out of operation, so it has turned from a net exporter of electricity to an importer

Major solar power projects lining up for permits in Montenegro

Major solar power projects lining up for permits in Montenegro

04 October 2024 - Investors are submitting another wave of applications to Montenegrin authorities for permits for major solar power projects

GEN-I second PV North Macedonia

GEN-I commissions its second PV plant in North Macedonia

03 October 2024 - GEN-I Group put into operation a 11.8 MW solar power plant in the municipality of Kavadarci in North Macedonia

EU Solar Jobs Report 2024 solarpower

Europe’s green job growth is faltering, solar workforce to increase 0.4% in 2024

03 October 2024 - The EU Solar Jobs Report 2024 has revised last year’s projection that the European Union would reach 1 million solar jobs by 2025