Electricity

Serbia considering three options for Đerdap 3 pumped storage hydropower plant

djerdap 3 romania serbia capacity veljko kovacevic

Photo: EPS

Published

October 2, 2024

Country

Comments

comments icon

0

Share

Published:

October 2, 2024

Country:

Comments:

comments icon

0

Share

Serbia is considering three options for the capacity of the Đerdap 3 pumped storage hydropower plant, according to the Ministry of Mining and Energy.

The Ministry and Mining said the feasibility study is in the final stage.

“We expect to complete an additional part called market simulation within a month, to get insight into the financial impact of the pumped storage hydropower plant on the operations of hydropower plant Đerdap 1 for long-term financial forecasts”, the ministry’s State Secretary Veljko Kovačević told Euronews Serbia.

Of note, the ministry said in March that the hydrology study and the preliminary feasibility study have been completed for Đerdap 3.

A capacity of 2,400 MW has been floated, but Kovačević now reveals three options are under consideration.

From a national to a regional project

“With 1,400 MW, we would have a pumped storage hydropower plant for the needs on the national level, with 1,800 MW we would already have a regional project, and the last option being considered, of 2,400 MW, changes the energy landscape of the wider region”, Kovačević stressed.

Pumped storage hydropower plants gained importance over the last several years, as by storing energy they enable greater integration of renewables. Serbia is currently much closer to the construction of another facility – Bistrica.

The location for Đerdap 3 is on the Danube and on the border with Romania, which therefore must be included in project preparation. Yugoslavia – including Serbia – and its neighbor jointly built the Đerdap 1 and 2 (Iron Gate 1 and 2) complex. Romania earlier suggested it could agree to participate with a 50% share.

In early August, Romanian Minister of Energy Sebastian Burduja said the government in Bucharest would carefully track the plans related to the investment. Romania won’t allow production at the existing Iron Gate 1 and 2 to come under jeopardy, he said.

US company Bechtel was involved in the preparation of the study

The Serbian side, in his words, sent initial data on the proposed investment and its impact on the infrastructure of Iron Gate 1 and 2. Serbia conducted the said study with United States–based company Bechtel, Burduja added.

It should be noted that Romania and Bulgaria qualified in July their joint hydropower project Turnu Măgurele – Nikopol on the Danube for the European Union’s financial support.

Comments (0)

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Enter Your Comment
Please wait... Please fill in the required fields. There seems to be an error, please refresh the page and try again. Your comment has been sent.

Related Articles

romania ppc bess battery salbatica wind farm

PPC to install 60 MWh battery system at Sălbatica wind farm

11 February 2026 - PPC operates the Sălbatica 1 and Sălbatica 2 wind farms, with a combined capacity of 140 MW, located in Tulcea County

Next generation geothermal challenging competitiveness gas power plants

Next generation geothermal challenging competitiveness of gas power plants

11 February 2026 - With its new solutions and falling costs, geothermal power can already replace 42% of EU coal- and gas-fired plant output, Ember found

El Mor advances delivery ready BESS projects Romania

El-Mor advances delivery-ready BESS projects in Romania

11 February 2026 - El-Mor Electric Installations & Services is advancing two large stand-alone BESS projects in Romania

north macedonia solar memo power exchange analysis ana angelova

Solar power production driving prices on North Macedonia’s power exchange

10 February 2026 - Ana Angelova, a market operations specialist at the National Electricity Market Operator, analyzed official power exchange data for 2024