Electricity

Serbia considering three options for Đerdap 3 pumped storage hydropower plant

djerdap 3 romania serbia capacity veljko kovacevic

Photo: EPS

Published

October 2, 2024

Country

Comments

comments icon

0

Share

Published:

October 2, 2024

Country:

Comments:

comments icon

0

Share

Serbia is considering three options for the capacity of the Đerdap 3 pumped storage hydropower plant, according to the Ministry of Mining and Energy.

The Ministry and Mining said the feasibility study is in the final stage.

“We expect to complete an additional part called market simulation within a month, to get insight into the financial impact of the pumped storage hydropower plant on the operations of hydropower plant Đerdap 1 for long-term financial forecasts”, the ministry’s State Secretary Veljko Kovačević told Euronews Serbia.

Of note, the ministry said in March that the hydrology study and the preliminary feasibility study have been completed for Đerdap 3.

A capacity of 2,400 MW has been floated, but Kovačević now reveals three options are under consideration.

From a national to a regional project

“With 1,400 MW, we would have a pumped storage hydropower plant for the needs on the national level, with 1,800 MW we would already have a regional project, and the last option being considered, of 2,400 MW, changes the energy landscape of the wider region”, Kovačević stressed.

Pumped storage hydropower plants gained importance over the last several years, as by storing energy they enable greater integration of renewables. Serbia is currently much closer to the construction of another facility – Bistrica.

The location for Đerdap 3 is on the Danube and on the border with Romania, which therefore must be included in project preparation. Yugoslavia – including Serbia – and its neighbor jointly built the Đerdap 1 and 2 (Iron Gate 1 and 2) complex. Romania earlier suggested it could agree to participate with a 50% share.

In early August, Romanian Minister of Energy Sebastian Burduja said the government in Bucharest would carefully track the plans related to the investment. Romania won’t allow production at the existing Iron Gate 1 and 2 to come under jeopardy, he said.

US company Bechtel was involved in the preparation of the study

The Serbian side, in his words, sent initial data on the proposed investment and its impact on the infrastructure of Iron Gate 1 and 2. Serbia conducted the said study with United States–based company Bechtel, Burduja added.

It should be noted that Romania and Bulgaria qualified in July their joint hydropower project Turnu Măgurele – Nikopol on the Danube for the European Union’s financial support.

Comments (0)

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Enter Your Comment
Please wait... Please fill in the required fields. There seems to be an error, please refresh the page and try again. Your comment has been sent.

Related Articles

montenegro natural gas power plants study epcg

Montenegro’s EPCG finishes study on gas power plants

12 January 2026 - State-owned power utility Elektroprivreda Crne Gore officially received a feasibility study for gas power plants in Montenegro

Greece IPTO mulls capital increase with existing shareholders

Greece’s IPTO mulls capital increase with existing shareholders

12 January 2026 - Independent Power Transmission Operator of Greece reportedly needs a capital boost of EUR 1.1 billion to keep the development plan on track

Belgium former Ministry of Energy Tinne Van der Straeten CEO WindEurope

Belgium’s former Ministry of Energy Tinne Van der Straeten to become CEO of WindEurope next month

12 January 2026 - WindEurope's CEO-appointee Tinne Van der Straeten, Belgium's former minister of energy, will assume office on February 2

Why CEE is one of most attractive regions investment new energy projects

Why CEE is one of most attractive regions for investment in new energy projects

12 January 2026 - Munir Hassan and Thomas Hamerl, partners in CMS's energy practice, outlined the developments in the renewable energy market for 2026