Electricity

Serbia considering three options for Đerdap 3 pumped storage hydropower plant

djerdap 3 romania serbia capacity veljko kovacevic

Photo: EPS

Published

October 2, 2024

Country

Comments

comments icon

0

Share

Published:

October 2, 2024

Country:

Comments:

comments icon

0

Share

Serbia is considering three options for the capacity of the Đerdap 3 pumped storage hydropower plant, according to the Ministry of Mining and Energy.

The Ministry and Mining said the feasibility study is in the final stage.

“We expect to complete an additional part called market simulation within a month, to get insight into the financial impact of the pumped storage hydropower plant on the operations of hydropower plant Đerdap 1 for long-term financial forecasts”, the ministry’s State Secretary Veljko Kovačević told Euronews Serbia.

Of note, the ministry said in March that the hydrology study and the preliminary feasibility study have been completed for Đerdap 3.

A capacity of 2,400 MW has been floated, but Kovačević now reveals three options are under consideration.

From a national to a regional project

“With 1,400 MW, we would have a pumped storage hydropower plant for the needs on the national level, with 1,800 MW we would already have a regional project, and the last option being considered, of 2,400 MW, changes the energy landscape of the wider region”, Kovačević stressed.

Pumped storage hydropower plants gained importance over the last several years, as by storing energy they enable greater integration of renewables. Serbia is currently much closer to the construction of another facility – Bistrica.

The location for Đerdap 3 is on the Danube and on the border with Romania, which therefore must be included in project preparation. Yugoslavia – including Serbia – and its neighbor jointly built the Đerdap 1 and 2 (Iron Gate 1 and 2) complex. Romania earlier suggested it could agree to participate with a 50% share.

In early August, Romanian Minister of Energy Sebastian Burduja said the government in Bucharest would carefully track the plans related to the investment. Romania won’t allow production at the existing Iron Gate 1 and 2 to come under jeopardy, he said.

US company Bechtel was involved in the preparation of the study

The Serbian side, in his words, sent initial data on the proposed investment and its impact on the infrastructure of Iron Gate 1 and 2. Serbia conducted the said study with United States–based company Bechtel, Burduja added.

It should be noted that Romania and Bulgaria qualified in July their joint hydropower project Turnu Măgurele – Nikopol on the Danube for the European Union’s financial support.

Comments (0)

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Enter Your Comment
Please wait... Please fill in the required fields. There seems to be an error, please refresh the page and try again. Your comment has been sent.

Related Articles

GGF ushers in new wave energy transition Western Balkans nine deals

GGF ushers in new wave of energy transition investments in Western Balkans with eight deals

01 December 2025 - The Green for Growth Fund has signed a series of agreements on green lending and energy projects throughout the Western Balkans

montenegro green hydrogen development program action plan

Montenegro drafts green hydrogen development program with 2026-2028 action plan

01 December 2025 - A public discussion is underway about the draft program with an action plan and strategic environmental assessment report

EPCG CBAM Sahmanovic

Šahmanović: Montenegro still in talks on CBAM postponement

28 November 2025 - Montenegro is still negotiating a postponement of the European Union’s carbon border tax or an exemption from the levy

Voltalia receives license for Spitalla PV plant in Albania

Voltalia receives license for Spitalla PV plant in Albania

27 November 2025 - French renewable energy company Voltalia obtained a 30-year license for its Spitalla solar park at the Albanian port city of Durrës