Renewables

Renewables are several times more profitable than fossil fuels

SolarPower-Europe-renewables-share-EU

Photo: Kenueone from Pixabay

Published

March 26, 2021

Country

Comments

comments icon

1

Share

Published:

March 26, 2021

Country:

Comments:

comments icon

1

Share

Investors in renewable power continue to outpace fossil fuel across the globe, according to the Imperial College and IEA. Total return has been 367% higher over the last ten years.

The investment case for green energy is clear and the global renewables portfolio is less correlated to the broader market than the global fossil fuel portfolio, especially so since the start of the economic downturn caused by the coronavirus pandemic, a report revealed. The Centre for Climate Finance and Investment at Imperial College Business School of London and the International Energy Agency found the ratio of risk and return for renewable power is superior in both typical market conditions and in crisis.

Profits from green electricity were 367% higher than from fossil fuels in the last ten years, the authors said. At the same time, annualized volatility (a measure of investment risk) for renewable power was lower than for fossil fuels in the global and advanced economies, but somewhat higher in China and in emerging markets and developing economies.

Energy companies should provide more data on their activities in green energy

The document examines the performance of publicly traded renewable energy and fossil fuel companies. Unfortunately, some of the largest renewables developers are not included due to the dilutive impact of their non-renewables activities, so the report highlights the need for standardized data and information on divisions within firms.

Producers of electricity from renewable sources have recently been flocking to stock markets to raise funds

The authors also concluded that there are no tools in the market for investors which would be equivalent to the portfolios developed for the purpose of the study. According to the document, the recent spike in initial public offerings appears to be a logical reaction to increasing investor demand for exposure to renewables.

More investment is necessary to catch up with demand

Under any scenario, energy investments will need to rise from 2020 levels to meet growing demand, it adds and points to growing evidence of the affordability of a transition away from reliance on fossil fuel for power generation.

There is growing evidence of the affordability of a transition away from reliance on fossil fuel

“Our research demonstrates that all over the world renewable power has outperformed fossil fuels. It’s been the same story for more than a decade, yet total investment is still lagging. National regulators, particularly in the United States, must get to work on the reforms needed to level the playing field for clean energy investors,” said Charles Donovan, Executive Director of the Centre for Climate Finance & Investment at Imperial College Business School.

Of note, a coalition of environmentalist organizations have just revealed in a report that the 60 largest banks on the planet still financed fossil fuel companies with USD 3.8 trillion from 2016 through last year, peaking in 2019 with USD 824 billion.

Comments (1)
Paulios / June 11, 2024

Internal rates of return (IRRs) – the standard commercial measure of an investment’s profitability – are around 15% to 20% on hydrocarbons, or higher. Typical IRRs on renewables today are around 5% to 6%.

That’s a major problem that’s going to require a paradigm shift level of change.

One could ‘pain’ the hydrocarbon industry to transition i.e. add a massive carbon tax that reduces the logic of following the IIR. Or hit their investors who strive for the better rate of return with a carbon tax on dividends .

Or maybe a carrot. Encourage via funding, tax breaks and the like for a transition and hard target approach i.e. if you miss the 2035 target you get hit for x% charge.

I’m sure there are many options, all very MECE but its quite a Fundamental challenge to say we want you to do something that’s inherently far less lucrative than what you’re currently doing. And sorry just because it’s the right thing to do just won’t cut it

Enter Your Comment
Please wait... Please fill in the required fields. There seems to be an error, please refresh the page and try again. Your comment has been sent.

Related Articles

axpo petrol ppa slovenia

Axpo, Petrol ink first physical PPA in Slovenia

10 October 2024 - It is the first PPA in the country for the physical delivery of electricity – to one of Petrol’s end customers

eles siemens energy memorandum Adnan Chaudhry mervar presern slovenia

ELES, Siemens Energy enter strategic partnership to develop digital technologies for electricity grids

09 October 2024 - Slovenia’s operator of the combined transmission and distribution network ELES has signed an MoU with Siemens Energy

TotalEnergies PPA Saint-Gobain France five year power purchase agreement

TotalEnergies to supply Saint-Gobain under five-year solar, wind PPA

09 October 2024 - TotalEnergies will supply renewable electricity to Saint-Gobain in France under a five-year power purchase agreement

Bulgarian mattress factory covers consumption 100 solar batteries

Bulgarian mattress factory covers its consumption 100% with solar, batteries

09 October 2024 - A photovoltaic system of 5.6 MW with a battery capacity of 15 MWh will meet the entire electricity needs of the TED mattress factory