Green Party proposes draft of new environmental impact assessment law over SHPPs

Photo: Green Party


July 16, 2018






July 16, 2018





The Green Party has submitted a proposal of a draft new environmental impact assessment law to introduce a mandatory impact assessment for small hydropower plants (SHPPs), the party said on its website.

The Green Party advocates a complete ban on the construction of SHPPs in protected areas and national parks.

“Protected areas and national parks should be preserved from devastation by the state. But who will protect them from the state?,” said Sonja Nikolić, electrical engineer and head of the Green Party Energy Council said, following the screening of the documentary “Blue Heart, which delves into how the construction of SHPPs devastates nature,” oin the party’s premises.

Investment costs for SHPPs are relatively low, she said.

“In addition, these costs are fully covered by citizens through feed-in tariffs. Each of us pays a fee for privileged energy producers through our electricity bills. We are forced to finance this type of energy, which is supposedly generated from a renewable energy sources. The owner of the hydroelectric power plant can achieve an investment return in four to five years while feed-in tariffs are paid for twelve years for the electricity it generates and sells. That’s why there is great interest in the construction of SHPPs,” she noted.

Ratko Bajčetić, vice president of the Green Party and expert in water management, said that while water is a renewable energy source, SHPPs are certainly not because they devastate almost everyone else.

Biodiversity, forests, and habitats of numerous flora and fauna species are being destroyed, while from the social point of view, the existence of the local population and traditional organic agriculture are endangered. “The question – is: Is all of this worth a few kWh of electricity?,” said Bajčetić.

Opposition to SHPPs mounts

A few days ago, Serbian Minister of Environmental Protection Goran Trivan announced an initiative to change the country’s nature protection law to avert the construction of SHPPs in protected areas. The move followed his recent attempt to pull approval for SHPP Pakleštica, threatening to hurt biodiversity in the Visočica river basin, near Pirot, which was quashed by a court.

Small hydropower plant projects in protected areas recently caused a spat between Trivan and the Ministry of Construction, Transportation, and Infrastructure, which said that it issued construction permits for the projects in question only after investors obtained all necessary permits, including environmental impact approvals.

Comments (0)

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Enter Your Comment
Please wait... Please fill in the required fields. There seems to be an error, please refresh the page and try again. Your comment has been sent.

Related Articles

Which countries in Western Balkans intend to introduce carbon tax cbam

Which Western Balkan countries intend to introduce carbon tax?

18 May 2022 - Countries are doing so in order to accelerate decarbonization, but also to avoid paying the carbon border tax announced by the EU


National environmental consultations for Stokholm+50: unbreakable link between healthy environment and human health

18 May 2022 - The Serbian Ministry of Environmental Protection and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), supported by the Government of Sweden, held the second meeting last week as part of Serbia’s Stockholm+50 national consultations.

Over 200 dams removed across Europe in 2021

Over 200 dams removed across Europe in 2021

17 May 2022 - Rivers in Europe are partitioned by over a million dams and barriers, many of which...

Bulgaria is guilty for air pollution rules European Court of Justice

16 May 2022 - Bulgaria has breached EU rules on air pollution because of failure to address SO2 pollution from super-polluting coal plants