Environment

Question isn’t whether lithium in Serbia will be mined or not, but who will do it – Brantner

serbia germany franziska brantner lithium jadar rio tinto china

Photo: Franziska Brantner/Facebook

Published

August 13, 2024

Country

Comments

comments icon

7 Comments

Share

Published:

August 13, 2024

Country:

Comments:

comments icon

7 Comments

Share

Franziska Brantner, Parliamentary State Secretary at Germany’s Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action, said the question isn’t whether lithium in Serbia would be mined or not, but if Rio Tinto and European partners would do it or China.

A few days ago, tens of thousands of people gathered in Belgrade to protest against Rio Tinto’s Jadar lithium project.

In an interview with German newspaper Tageszeitung, Franziska Brantner said lithium is among the raw materials necessary for climate action. It is mined in Australia and Chile, but entirely processed in China.

Since the Russian aggression on Ukraine, it has become clear, in her words, that dependence on others is dangerous.

The goal of the German government is to reduce such dependencies and the project in Serbia could be the cornerstone of its strategy, the official said.

Rio Tinto’s original plans didn’t meet the European Union’s environmental standards

Brantner stressed that Rio Tinto’s original plans didn’t meet European environmental standards. It was the right thing to protest against the project and it is good it was terminated, she added. According to Brantner, the German government and the European Commission have called for a change in concept.

Lithium in Serbia should only be extracted in processes that aren’t harming the environment, with a high level of water and soil protection and a very good plan for waste disposal, she asserted.

With the pressure in Serbia, among other factors, the project was redeveloped, according to Brantner. Now there is a new landfill concept, she added. More mining waste would be reused and it shouldn’t be done in the middle of a river valley, the official claimed.

There is also a new concept for water protection, and the project leans on renewable energy sources, she said.

Are Germany and Europe stabbing Serbia in the back?

The German newspaper’s interviewer noted that the examples of Chile and in other regions of the world show that lithium mining causes devastation in the surrounding area. He pointed to the Serbian population’s resistance and asked Brantner Germany and Europe are stabbing the country in the back.

Germany has taken the concerns of the Serbian population into account very seriously and made efforts to adjust Rio Tinto’s plan, she said.

According to Brantner, the European Union will monitor the new environmental impact assessments to make sure that environmental standards are met. The EU also intends to develop a value chain for battery production and e-mobility, she said.

Unlike many other projects around the world, where the raw material is only exported, here, in her words, the local population would participate in the value chain.

The control over the project is in the hands of Serbia

Rio Tinto has vowed to comply with EU environmental law, though in Serbia it applies only partially, according to Brantner. It is up to Serbia to oversee the project, while the EU and Germany can provide expert advice, she added.

European companies, in her words, also want compliance with environmental standards.

Brantner acknowledged that the local population and opposition parties are right to demand from state institutions to enforce environmental standards. At the same time, it is good if Europe has its own mines and processes the ore in line with its rules, according to the state secretary.

EU wants to prevent China from increasing its influence on European sources of raw materials

That way the EU is preventing China from exerting greater influence with regard to European sources of raw materials, Brantner stressed.

The question is not whether the lithium project in Serbia would materialize, but whether Rio Tinto and European partners would implement it or the Chinese would, she said. Brantner expressed the belief that a partnership between Serbia and China wouldn’t bring more benefits for democracy, the environment, and population in Serbia.

The new Jadar project is also an opportunity fto show the world that German and European companies are making a difference and that the extraction and processing of raw materials can be much more environmentally friendly than until now, Brantner said.

Comments (7)
Petar / August 15, 2024

Germany have more lithium than Serbia, dig in your own country and leave us alone.

Vučiću pederu / August 15, 2024

Nećete kopati!

Mina / August 16, 2024

Why in Serbia, and why not in Germany? It would be easier to follow environmental standards in Germany, where Greens are part of the government, than is Serbia where one party and one man has absolute control over everything and where corruption blossoms.

Vesna Nikolic / August 16, 2024

Brantner stated: Rio Tinto’s original plans didn’t meet the European Union’s environmental standards.
“Brantner stressed that Rio Tinto’s original plans didn’t meet European environmental standards. It was the right thing to protest against the project, and it is good it was terminated, she added. According to Brantner, the German government and the European Commission have called for a change in concept.”

Analysis: According to what Brantner stressed in the interview, this means that the German government and the European Commission have not taken Rio Tinto’s original plan seriously before the protest of the Serbian population but only after the protest and then have called for a change in concept.

Question: Would Ms. Brantner let Rio Tinto, or any other foreign company mines to mine lithium or any other raw material in Germany for 3 % profit to Germany?
Then:
Ms. Brantner stated: “Since the Russian aggression on Ukraine, it has become clear, in her words, that dependence on others is dangerous.
“The goal of the German government is to reduce such dependencies and the project in Serbia could be the cornerstone of its strategy, the official said.”

Analysis: Why doesn’t Ms. Brantner let Germany be the cornerstone of the strategy to reduce the German government’s dependency on others?
Germany now wants to depend on Serbia’s raw materials, instead on China and Russia, because of the war in Ukraine. Since this became an issue for the German government, as stated, to rely on other’s raw materials, why rather doesn’t Germany depend on German’s raw materials?
Germany has approx. 14 times more lithium then Serbia, so it should be the cornerstone for their government and the European Union to become leaders and heroes in thier mission save the climate, as stated.

Vesna / August 16, 2024

Who has the sovereignty of Serbia: The people of Serbia or the secretary for climate change in Germany?
Are the people of Serbia missing something here?
Something has to be clear here: The people of Serbia and, only, the people of Serbia will decide how to govern their raw materials situated in Serbia, unless the sovereignty is given away to someone else, Germany or any other country, meaning occupied.

Vesna / August 16, 2024

Only Serbian people will decide whether lithium in Serbia will be mined or not.
Serbian people, and only Serbian people have sovereignty over Serbia!
Can Brantner confirm who has sovereignty over Serbia? If somebody other than Serbia, then let the Serbian citizens know who exactly is taking away sovereignty from them.

Ana Paris / September 27, 2024

Serbian People simply don’t agree ! There is nothing to do there for you – Rio Tinto, Germany and EU in this agricultural land. Frau Brantner, better stay home and DIG German Lithium (must be good quality) in your beautuful country for the amazing German Green car Industry. Nice Project !!! Or – Ask China for it !!! We realy don’t need your Mercedes, BMW etc. And also – As you probably guessed – It will be the most agressive way you’re back in our country… For the 4th time !!! We all still remember all german actions. Stay Home. Serbian Government decision is not the People’ Voice ! We have all rights to keep our water, soil and air healthy for the future generations in the Balkans… Live us alone ! We realy Don’t need that Europe !

Enter Your Comment
Please wait... Please fill in the required fields. There seems to be an error, please refresh the page and try again. Your comment has been sent.

Related Articles

birds biodiversity

Greece suspends three wind projects over biodiversity concerns

11 December 2024 - Environmentalists urge suspension of all wind projects in areas affected by the 2023 wildfires to preserve sensitive bird species.

Bulgarian citizens demand referendum on wind farm construction on agricultural land

Bulgarian citizens demand referendum on wind farms on agricultural land

09 December 2024 - Citizens from four Bulgarian districts protested in Varna, calling for a referendum on constructing solar and wind farms on agricultural land

serbia green budget projects 2025 railway

Serbia introduces Green Budget, earmarks EUR 1 billion for projects

06 December 2024 - The 2025 Budget Law includes the first Green Budget annex, listing 64 green projects to be implemented next year

mars sa drine, lawsuit, environmental impact assessment, jadar, rio tinto

Citizens asked to join complaint against Serbia’s EIA requirements for lithium project Jadar

05 December 2024 - Activist group Marš sa Drine called on citizens to join its complaint against Serbia's requirements for the environmental study for Rio Tinto's lithium project Jadar