News

Reforms, forest quality conversion needed for biomass suply

Published

April 28, 2015

Comments

comments icon

0

Share

Published:

April 28, 2015

Comments:

comments icon

0

Share

Official information from public sources about forests in Serbia, most importantly from the national inventory from nine years ago, has a lot of discrepancy and data varies very much, even up to six times in some important categories, said Nenad Petrović, a docent at Faculty of Forestry in Belgrade. One of the main reasons, in his words, is inacurate records. The overall quality and age of Serbian forests isn’t at all favourable, and systematic conversion is necessary, Petrović said at the last round table of ‘Political awareness raising and networking events’, a component of the project  ‘Development of a Sustainable Bioenergy Market in Serbia’, implemented by the Belgrade Fund for Political Excellence and supported by German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ). The event in Belgrade’s Hyatt hotel covered possibilities and perspectives of biomass utilization.

Letters of commitment were signed with 10 municipalities in Serbia that want to substitute fossil fuels with biomass in district heating, said Rainer Schellhaas, manager of biomass supply component in a programme by German international cooperation enterprise GIZ.

Petrović also spoke of potentials that wood biomass has for a sustainable economic and social development and its environmental aspect. He stated that forests in private ownership, 47% of existing stock, have great potential. However, these are small units, in the range of three hectares, and even separated into several unregistered lots after inheritance, he said. Unfortunately, new generations aren’t interested in managing such a resource, especially if they move to towns and cities, Petrović added. One way forward would be for the government to develop measures to stimulate forest owners to organize into associations, he concluded.

The final conference, held in Belgrade on April 28, rounded and presented the conclusions from previous five roundtable. Over 60 people from business sector, state administration, local authorities, NGOs, media and scientific and professional environment attended the event and participated in one of four working groups.

One of the most important conclusions of the series of events is the need for the legal framework to be brought in line with public policies in order to enable the most efficient use of available biomass capacities and develop the potential for growing additional quantities of this energy source through cultivating energy crops.

The following four topics have been identified as the major problems in sustainable development of bioenergy market in Serbia: using biomass for heating in households and district heating systems – economic and energy efficiency, availability and potentials of sustainable forest biomass utilization in the future, public–private partnership and biomass utilization projects and energy poverty and population health.

 

 

 

Related Articles

Europe adds 19 1 GW wind power 2025 EU lags behind targets

Europe adds 19.1 GW of wind power in 2025 – EU lags behind targets

26 February 2026 - Germany accounted for 30% of European growth of 19.1 GW last year, according to WindEurope. Turkey remains dominant in the southeast.

drina buk bijela lake

Hydropower plants to transform upper Drina river into lake, say environmentalists

25 February 2026 - The planned hydropower plants on the upper course of the Drina will alter the ecosystem and local climate, the Center for Environment warned

croatia hadbooks licensing renewables hrote eihp

Croatia releases handbooks for permits for renewable energy investors

25 February 2026 - The Croatian Energy Market Operator (HROTE) and the Hrvoje Požar Energy Institute (EIHP) have issued two handbooks for investors

US LNG deals supply Central and Eastern Europe Balkans

US landing LNG deals to supply Central and Eastern Europe, Balkans

25 February 2026 - A group of European and Balkan countries agreed with the US to enhance gas supply, primarily by purchasing its LNG